3 ms·
WSL throughput is not enough for file intensive operations. It is much easier and straightforward to just delete windows and use Linux.
by enceladus06 1y ago
WSL throughput is not enough for file intensive operations. It is much easier and straightforward to just delete windows and use Linux.
- okanat 1y agoUsing the Linux filesystem has almost no performance penalty under WSL2 since it is a VM. Docker Desktop automatically mounts the correct filesystem. Crossing the OS boundary for Windows files has some overhead of course but that's not the usecase WSL2 is optimized for. With WSL2 you get the best of both worlds. A system with perfect driver and application support and a Linux-native environment. Hybrid GPUs, webcams, lap sensors etc. all work without any configuration effort. You get good battery life. You can run Autodesk or Photoshop but at the same time you can run Linux apps with almost no performance loss.
- thrawa8387336 1y agoFWIW I get better battery life with ubuntu.
- elektrontamer 1y agoHow? What's your laptop brand and model? I've never had better battery life with any machine using ubuntu.
- okanat 1y agoAre you comparing against the default vendor image that's filled with adware or a clean Windows install with only drivers? There is a significant power use difference and the latter case has always been more power efficient for me compared to the Linux setup. Powering down Nvidia GPU has never fully worked with Linux for me.
- sarlalian 1y agoUnless you need to have a working video or audio config as well.