3 ms·
> My input stream is full of it: Fear and loathing and cheerleading and prognosticating on what generative AI means and whether it’s Good or Bad and what we sho
by keybored 1y ago
> My input stream is full of it: Fear and loathing and cheerleading and prognosticating on what generative AI means and whether it’s Good or Bad and what we should be doing. All the channels: Blogs and peer-reviewed papers and social-media posts and business-news stories. So there’s lots of AI angst out there, but this is mine. I think the following is a bit unique because it focuses on cost, working backward from there. As for the genAI tech itself, I guess I’m a moderate; there is a there there, it’s not all slop.
Let’s see.
> But, while I have a lot of sympathy for the contras and am sickened by some of the promoters, at the moment I’m mostly in tune with Thomas Ptacek’s My AI Skeptic Friends Are All Nuts. It’s long and (fortunately) well-written and I (mostly) find it hard to disagree with.
So the Moderate is a Believer. But it’s offset by being concerned about The Climate and The Education and The Investments.
You can try to write a self-aware/moment-aware intro. It’s the same fodder for the front page.
- CaptainFever 1y agoAs someone who is pretty strongly pro-AI, I felt that the article was leaning a bit on the anti side. So given our two opinions, I think "moderate" is a pretty good descriptor (people on both sides think you lean towards the other side).
- keybored 1y agoThe primary purpose[1] of flooding the frontpage with AI thinkpieces is to, more narrowly, champion the AI application towards software development. Being skeptical towards electricity use and uses in Education are not as important. [1] Which is an emergent phenomena