5 ms·
„Container“ is sort of synonymous with „OCI-compatible container“ these days, and OCI itself is basically a retcon standard for docker (runtime, images etc.). S
by formerly_proven 1y ago
„Container“ is sort of synonymous with „OCI-compatible container“ these days, and OCI itself is basically a retcon standard for docker (runtime, images etc.). So from that perspective every „container system“ is necessarily „docker-like“ and that means Linux namespaces and cgroups.
- pjmlp 1y agoWith a whole generation forgetting they came first in big iron UNIX like HP-UX.
- 9dev 1y agoDoes it really matter, tho?
- pjmlp 1y agoSome people think it matters to properly learn history, instead of urban myths.
- 9dev 1y agoHistory is one thing, who-did-it-first is often just a way to make a point in faction debates. In the broader picture, it makes little difference IMHO.
- bandoti 1y agoAnother reason it matters is they might have done it differently which could inspire future improvements. :) I like to read bibliographies for that reason—to read books that inspired the author I’m reading at the time. Same goes for code and research papers!
- jeberle 1y agoInteresting. My experience w/ HP-UX was in the 90s, but this (Integrity Virtual Machines) was released in 2005. I might call out FreeBSD Jails (2000) or Solaris Zones (2005) as an earlier and a more significant case respectively. I appreciate the insight, though, never knew about HP-UX. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Integrity_Virtual_Machines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Integrity_Virtual_Machines
- pjmlp 1y agoHP-UX Vault, released with HP-UX 10.24, in 1996, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-UX https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-UX What you searched for is an evolution of it.