3 ms·
The logic outlined in other posts is that this is because software is seen as an asset that nets dividend. As such, like with houses you can’t deduct all the co
by spockz 1y ago
The logic outlined in other posts is that this is because software is seen as an asset that nets dividend. As such, like with houses you can’t deduct all the costs at once because you keep extracting value out of it.
I’m not sure whether I understand why that now applies only to software and not other things.
- digitaltrees 1y agoThose arguments fall short when considering the fact that that the construction company deducted the wages of the workers that built the house. The software development firm is the builder not the home owner.
- jncfhnb 1y agoIf you’re building software to use or sell to other people you are definitely the owner. If you’re a body shop lending out devs to build software for other people, that would be different