3 ms·
Yeah dumping a bunch of commits that do nothing might be considered "active" by some people. I wouldn't consider it active.
by const_cast 1y ago
Yeah dumping a bunch of commits that do nothing might be considered "active" by some people. I wouldn't consider it active.
- firesteelrain 1y agoBetter than current Xorg activity ;) (which is very low)
- const_cast 1y agoEh, I don't know. There's an argument to be made that no changes is preferable to breaking changes with little or no benefit.
- bmacho 1y agoWhat are the options? a) noone looks at the code b) they make random user-facing changes c) random churn that makes the code better (preferably with as few user-facing modifications as possible) IMO the best option is c). Guy is literally doing the single best thing possible.