3 ms·
So in your world model, whoever Ajit Pai sides with is the worst group? Or is it just the group that's willing to pay the most (and I guess Ajit Pai is the mos
by bko 1y ago
So in your world model, whoever Ajit Pai sides with is the worst group?
Or is it just the group that's willing to pay the most (and I guess Ajit Pai is the most expensive lobbyist)?
Because the article quotes from groups like Spectrum for the Future, which is an industry group funded by cable companies like Comcast, which are the former bad guys.
I just want to understand a coherent world model in which you can confidently draw an opinion on a complex subject base on the actions of one guy that was in the news 10 years ago.
https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/spectrum-for-the-future-written-input.pdf https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/spectrum-for-the-fu...
- szundi 1y ago[dead]
- DetroitThrow 1y ago>So in your world model, whoever Ajit Pai sides with is the worst group? There was no value judgment made in the previous comment about which group is worst. The word 'mercenary' is pretty self explanatory here. It's a bit contrived and tedious to view any discussion of the news as an opportunity to invent each speakers' worldview in your head, before they even speak about it, eh?
- shortrounddev2 1y agoIf you are paying huge sums of money to effectively bribe the government to do what you want, you are the bad guy Edit: If you think politics is entirely about budgets and taxes and not human rights or a fundamental respect for democratic governance, then yes, they're close - in that sense, there's barely any difference between the Government of the UK and that of Hungary's Victor Orban, since they both provide universal healthcare to their people. However, there's obviously major differences between these governments that go well beyond the myopic lens of stated party policy positions.