2 ms·
Something does seem off there, but maybe it's sloppy reporting. The article states: Unless he can show specific manufacturing documentation by August 29,
by kjhughes 14y ago
Something does seem off there, but maybe it's sloppy reporting. The article states:
Unless he can show specific manufacturing documentation
by August 29, Keith said he could be fined as much as
250 percent on his solar panels -- an effective rate of
$270,000.
Besides the 250% "fine", the dangling $270,000 reference (and calling it a 'rate') is confusing.