I guess the side that give the Nobel prize to lobotomies wasnt backed by evidence? Or were they backed by evidence? And then stronger more compelling evidence

I guess the side that give the Nobel prize to lobotomies wasnt backed by evidence? Or were they backed by evidence? And then stronger more compelling evidence came out later against? Thats kind of how science works, its a process of discovery not a set in stone right/wrong. Things arent as reductionist as you claim, it does people good when they open their world up to that fact.