3 ms·
> It's not the same as a Federal system where there is one way and the rest are derivatives of it. The general framework is still based on the same core princi
by friendzis 1y ago
> It's not the same as a Federal system where there is one way and the rest are derivatives of it.
The general framework is still based on the same core principles and regulations, therefore cores most of the systems are much more alike than different. The differences come in additional details, where data models can be extended from common core and local workflows and local integrations, where custom development is required anyway. If those custom developments are built on top of common open core, the know-how translates laterally across whole EU and expertise can at the very least be shared.
- bilekas 1y ago> The general framework is still based on the same core principles and regulations, therefore cores most of the systems are much more alike than different. No not really, I can say from an IE point of view, the reason the border at northern Ireland was such an issue for Brexit was because the good Friday agreement was because this was done outside of the EU. If the EU had the same authority as the Federal in the US as an example, there would be a hard border. General framework yes, for regulations, but how you run your government, absolutely is up to you. Just look to Ordaban in Hungary. Not exactly playing well with the EU, doesn't mean the EU can force him to do something. Edit : Again there are nuances with the EU. And there are issues, but overall it works really well. - Was going to correct Orban's name but he's worth less the effort than typing this.
- friendzis 1y agoOkay, it seems there is misunderstanding. What I meant that having multiple, slightly incompatible reimplementations of essentially the same base software is the biggest technical problem for common data access.