> The entire article is saying "it looks kinds like a human in some ways, but people are being fooled!" The question is, what's wrong with that? At some level

> The entire article is saying "it looks kinds like a human in some ways, but people are being fooled!" The question is, what's wrong with that? At some level there's a very human desire for something genuine and I suspect that no matter the "humanness" of an AI, it will never be able to close that desire for genuine. Or maybe... it is that people don't like the idea of dealing with an intelligence that will almost always have the upper hand because of information disparity.