4 ms·
To me, it's empathetic and caring. Which the LLMs will never be, unless you give money to OpenAI. Robots won't go get food for your sick, dying friend.
by xyzal 1y ago
To me, it's empathetic and caring. Which the LLMs will never be, unless you give money to OpenAI.
Robots won't go get food for your sick, dying friend.
- zephyr9 1y agoA robot could certainly be programmed to get food for a sick, dying friend (I mean, don't drones deliver Uber Eats?) but it will never understand why, or have a phenomenal experience of the act, or have a mental state of performing the act, or have the biological brain state of performing the act, or etc. etc.
- JKCalhoun 1y agoInteresting. I wonder why? Perhaps when we deliver food to our sick friend we subconsciously feel an "atta boy" from our parents who perhaps "trained" us in how to be kind when we were young selfish things. Obviously if that's all it is we could of course "reinforce" this in AI.
- squidbeak 1y ago"Never" is a very broad word.
- diggan 1y agoThat implies that people who aren't empathetic and/or caring aren't human, which I guess could be argued too, but feels too simplistic. > Which the LLMs will never be I'd argue LLMs will never be anything, they're giving you the text you're asking for, nothing more and nothing less. You don't tell them "to be" empathic and caring? Well, they're not gonna appear like that then, but if you do tell them, they'll do their best to emulate that.