3 ms·
The paper was written by highly accomplished ML researchers who don’t have any stake in Apple’s continued success. Framing this peer-reviewed research written b
by emp17344 1y ago
The paper was written by highly accomplished ML researchers who don’t have any stake in Apple’s continued success. Framing this peer-reviewed research written by respected authors as “sour grapes” is intellectually dishonest.
- reliabilityguy 1y ago> Framing this peer-reviewed research How do you know it was peer-reviewed? What venue had accepted this paper for publication?
- tough 1y agohow many papers do apple publish under their own CDN/domains this was certainly a first for me when i saw it pop on hn the other day
- reliabilityguy 1y agoThey publish papers pretty frequently https://machinelearning.apple.com/research?domain=Speech%20and%20Natural%20Language%20Processing https://machinelearning.apple.com/research?domain=Speech%20a... Doesn’t mean they are peer reviewed
- tough 1y agogot it thanks
- dandellion 1y agoIt's easy to argue about the people who write the paper and their incentives. It takes a lot more effort to prove that the data, the procedure or the conclusion in the paper has flaws, and back it up.
- android521 1y agoIf they get paid by apple, they have a stake
- emp17344 1y agoThis kind of statement isn’t productive. Everyone has a bias. If you don’t believe the paper is valid, I’d like to hear your substantive critique.