29 ms·
Eh, depending on the amount of content on the page astro + react is fine. Astro lets you output everything as static html so it doesn’t hurt your page scores I
by shoeb00m 1y ago
Eh, depending on the amount of content on the page astro + react is fine. Astro lets you output everything as static html so it doesn’t hurt your page scores
I find that there is a context switching cost going from react to vanilla html/js/css. So i just default to react on everything.
- neepi 1y agoThey took two days and used react components and all sorts of shit and we nearly missed the deadline due to it. The page I did was less than 4K with all content and css embedded and took me 10 minutes. There's doing the job and there's costing the company a boat load of money doing the job.
- jiggawatts 1y ago"You see, I have this hammer." "I need a screw driven." "Hammer! I have a hammer. Just one. This one."
- shoeb00m 1y agoOk fair enough, but I think you just have incompetent devs
- neepi 1y agoThat is precisely my point.
- owebmaster 1y agoThere should be no context change from not using React, unless one is a very junior programmer
- Shorn 1y agoo_O Not sure what you were intending to say, but here's what I parsed when reading that post: "There should be no context change from <changing the context>".