> are you saying those sentences are "disinformation"? The exercise was to illustrate the ease of producing disinformation. The topic was chosen to allow a po

> are you saying those sentences are "disinformation"? The exercise was to illustrate the ease of producing disinformation. The topic was chosen to allow a popular LLM offering the ability to produce plausible sentences supporting a conspiratorial position. The rest of your post interprets generated text, which I clearly identified as being such, as if it were a position I hold and not what it is: Statistically generated text produced by an algorithm