2 ms·

I struggle to understand your point - I'd love to here a bit more to understand it. The IRR numbers I mention refer to UFCF/equity, i.e. no exit (hence return)

• lifeisstillgood 14y ago
  That the return (assuming no sale at top of a bubble) for the best companies in the biggest industry of 19C was only 5%-10%. (Based on equity, it seems Harford did not calculate dividend return which may make a difference) Making 15-20% without an exit is a great deal - supporting I think your point.
  • antr 14y ago
    Indeed, I agree. I'd be curious to know how common was the use of debt during that period. 5%-10% is a good return on an unlevered asset, debt could provide an additional turn - then, I don't know how the Kd and CPI was during that period.
    • lifeisstillgood 14y ago
      During the 19th Century, U.S. railroads relied primarily on debt issues to finance their growth. This policy contributed to major financial crises (www.biu.ac.il/soc/ec/wp/16-01/16-01.pdf) Is that what you mean - or derivatives?
      • antr 14y ago
        just wanted to know - now it's clear