3 ms·
Having /includes/ under document root - and trying to fix this via a robots.txt entry (??) - wouldn't reflect well on Obama, if they actually had any meaning :)
by nir 18y ago
Having /includes/ under document root - and trying to fix this via a robots.txt entry (??) - wouldn't reflect well on Obama, if they actually had any meaning :)
- eli 18y agoYou're making assumptions about what that directory is for. Perhaps it is used to store static HTML pages that are included from IFRAMEs on other pages.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- jonursenbach 18y agoWell that's at least tons better than hiding the entire site with hundreds of Disallow entries, when they could have just done /*.
- mdasen 18y agoThe includes folder looks like it's just JavaScript and CSS (including jQuery) so it has to be under the document root.
- nir 18y agoSorry, I'm taking that back... I was thinking of Obama's campaign site where you could actually access stuff like /includes/footer.php (at least for a while, seems to be fixed now)