2 ms·
Forth it's easy, but Lisp the core implementation can be easy, yes, but you need to implement Lisp in Lisp, similar to Forth under itself. Heck, I tested for..
by anthk 1y ago
Forth it's easy, but Lisp the core implementation can be easy, yes, but you need to implement Lisp in Lisp, similar to Forth under itself.
Heck, I tested for...next from Eforth under PFE Forth with Forth words, not C. Forth may be the only good case for an easy syntax.
I mean, the Lisp syntax it's dumb easy too but you need to develop the rest of features. Is not just about lists, car and cdr. Altough if you get eval/apply the rest writes itself, such as map and proc.