4 ms·
> Using government money to win ideological arguments is S.O.P. for the Trump II admin. This is literally also what the dems were doing with USAID discrediting
by DaSHacka 1y ago
> Using government money to win ideological arguments is S.O.P. for the Trump II admin.
This is literally also what the dems were doing with USAID discrediting gamergate and funding bias news networks, neither party is above it.
- overfeed 1y agoI remember when Obama threatened Fox Sports mergers due to how Fox News covered his first term in office, and trued to get the Saudis to sign a pro-choice vendor agreement with the embassy. Biden also threatened law firms that represented Trump and threatened to ban them from government buildings and revoke security clearance. It was the standard thing for dems to do when dealing with political opponents. Both sides are totally the same thing, there's nothing to be done.
- mschoch 1y ago[dead]
- bhouston 1y ago> Biden also threatened law firms that represented Trump and threatened to ban them from government buildings and revoke security clearance. I did a few quick searches for more information about this claim of yours. I also asked Claude and ChatGPT to research it. I can not find any sources to back up this claim of yours. Can you source it for me? For example: https://claude.ai/share/d36c7a89-adff-4625-9cd6-89e60b254ea1 https://claude.ai/share/d36c7a89-adff-4625-9cd6-89e60b254ea1 https://chatgpt.com/share/684972cb-0140-8006-9f0f-9075537bf259 https://chatgpt.com/share/684972cb-0140-8006-9f0f-9075537bf2...
- overfeed 1y agoIt was a rhetorical device ascribing things Trump actually did to Democratic presidents to show parent's false equivalency. Everything I listed were things Trump did, though I changed the other parties involved to preserve the political dynamics as best as I could.