3 ms·
I’ve been exploring the idea of using one-time investments at birth to create self-sustaining retirement systems — not as charity, but as a compound-interest-po
by absurdwebsite 1y ago
I’ve been exploring the idea of using one-time investments at birth to create self-sustaining retirement systems — not as charity, but as a compound-interest-powered policy model.
Basic math:
$3,284 invested at birth
10% average annual return (S&P 500 historical average)
Held for 60 years
Final value: ~$1,000,000
This isn’t wishful thinking — it’s Warren Buffett’s exact formula: start early, let time do the work.
Currently, retirement contributions typically begin around age 25–30. But starting at birth unlocks the full power of compounding — something policy almost completely ignores.
Even many municipalities already offer baby grants ($500–1,000). But if just a portion of that were invested long-term, the difference would be staggering.
Here’s a simple petition I launched to push this forward as policy:
https://chng.it/D2RMjjGGKf https://chng.it/D2RMjjGGKf
I’d love to hear the HN crowd’s take:
Would this work globally?
Are there legal/ethical/systemic blockers?
Has anyone done this personally for their children?
It feels like planting a financial tree at birth — and letting it grow for decades.