> That's a bit uncharitable towards the article. I didn't think so; I also tried to read the article, but spreading out a 20 word answer over what seemed like

> That's a bit uncharitable towards the article. I didn't think so; I also tried to read the article, but spreading out a 20 word answer over what seemed like 2000 words of navel-gazing got me out of there in a hurry.