I'm disappointed by more limited use by product developers: Synchronous coding for core features > For more critical features touching the application's bus

I'm disappointed by more limited use by product developers: Synchronous coding for core features > For more critical features touching the application's business logic, the team works synchronously with Claude Code, giving detailed prompts with specific implementation instructions. They monitor the process in real-time to ensure code quality, style guide compliance, and proper architecture while letting Claude handle the repetitive coding work. I question the 'synchronous' aspect. Whenever I try to use it, it feels very batch oriented with the delays interrupting my thoughts and workflow, often starting to do something else.