3 ms·
> in order to help that department become more efficient Sorry, you had a noble aim but you just introduced a whole new load of bias to the statement. That no
by afavour 1y ago
> in order to help that department become more efficient
Sorry, you had a noble aim but you just introduced a whole new load of bias to the statement.
That notion that DOGE is trying to make the government more efficient is exactly the “partisan crap” you deride. There is no evidence of them actually doing so, if anything it seems they’ve cost the government money.