4 ms·
Those two things really aren't the same at all, so I don't see where you're going with this. If it's an established biological fact that there are different su
by foldr 1y ago
Those two things really aren't the same at all, so I don't see where you're going with this.
If it's an established biological fact that there are different subspecies of humans, then it should be possible to find a reference for that.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- nomel 1y ago> Those two things really aren't the same at all Precise equality isn't required for a conceptual discussion, especially one that's so ill defined/subjective as the concept of subspecies [1]. It's an established political fact that classifying humans, at any level, could never be presented. That's not a bad thing, but it's also a mostly arbitrary thing. [1] https://bioone.org/journals/the-auk/volume-132/issue-2/AUK-1 https://bioone.org/journals/the-auk/volume-132/issue-2/AUK-1...