3 ms·
I think using the example of Nazi content and the first amendment is a distraction. What’s relevant is speech that is not legally protected. Should the New Yor
by tshaddox 1y ago
I think using the example of Nazi content and the first amendment is a distraction. What’s relevant is speech that is not legally protected.
Should the New York Times have civil libel liability for what they publish in a newspaper? Should Google have civil libel liability for what they publish on YouTube?
- Manuel_D 1y ago> Should Google have civil libel liability for what they publish on YouTube? They do. What they don't have liability for, is content that users post to YouTube.
- beej71 1y agoFor me, the more pertinent question is should I be liable for not-legally-protected content people post to my comment section on my website?