3 ms·
From bio: > Trade private equity > The court order seems reasonable. Checks out.
by throwaway314155 1y ago
From bio:
> Trade private equity
> The court order seems reasonable.
Checks out.
- thegrim33 1y agoCould also just look at their submission history; all they do is post political content every single day of their life. Such a person is not going to have overly impartial/intelligent takes on issues. I wish there was a plugin that could do sentiment analysis and auto-filter out such users from submissions/comments shown to me. Or just a button I could manually click to never see a person's posts again.
- JumpCrisscross 1y agoFair enough, I’m by default deferential to our courts. In this case, however, there is a simple solution if OpenAI doesn’t want to save data: don’t retain it in the first place. If OpenAI committed to privacy as a value, their protests would have merit. But in this case it sounds like they want the ability to retain the data as well as delete it despite being in the midst of litigation. That’s simply not a privilege anyone is afforded by the courts. (We’re also talking about the Times versus a $100+ bn tech giant whose CEO has direct lines to heads of state. There is no David to default sympathy to.)