4 ms·
FWIW: this might be a suggestion of the specific audit team you’re working with or a requirement of one of the “follow our playbook and you’ll pass” vendors if
by sethhochberg 1y ago
FWIW: this might be a suggestion of the specific audit team you’re working with or a requirement of one of the “follow our playbook and you’ll pass” vendors if you’re using one of those, but the SOC 2 on its own doesn’t really impose specific technical feature/control requirements like this.
I don’t have the exact exam language in front of me right now but the requirement would be something like “you have some process for learning about, assessing, and mitigating vulnerabilities in software dependencies that you use”.
Enabling an automated scan and version bump tool like dependabot is a common and easy way to prove your organization has those capabilities. But you could implement whatever process you want here and prove that you do it on the schedule you say you do in order to satisfy the audit requirement.
- latchkey 1y agoTrue on all counts. But the lowest effort is "just turn off dependabot", which is what I suspect most of the people trying to get past SOC2 will do (like myself).