7 ms·
Even better, it's valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehouse.gov%2F&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inli
by bgutierrez 18y ago
Even better, it's valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehouse.gov%2F&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehous...
- axod 18y ago//<![CDATA[ Why is this good? & why is it better than HTML4.01 Strict? XHTML is not beautiful. //]]>
- teej 18y agoXHTML is also pointless when it's served up at text/html
- evdawg 18y agoWho cares if it validates? The underlying markup is pretty unsemantic. Just because it validates doesn't mean it's a well-coded website.