3 ms·
The negative thing being described was the inability of 95% of the engineers to use the 20% time which was being described by the company as a general perk. "T
by dsr_ 1y ago
The negative thing being described was the inability of 95% of the engineers to use the 20% time which was being described by the company as a general perk.
"The company is deceiving people and should reconsider messaging to reflect reality" is not a personal attack; even in a "blameless" culture, you are expected to note that the causal chain includes "Dave hit the wrong button, which should not have happened because we should have safeguards on the button and reviews to make sure we have safeguards on all the expensive/dangerous buttons." Sorry, Dave.
- jeffbee 1y ago20% time was always for the high performers who can do 100% of their work in 80% of the time.
- Aunche 1y agoThat's what she portrayed it as, but it doesn't pass the smell test. Why would a manager be yelled at for company wide statistics? This and all the other aggressive framing suggests to me that she's not a reliable narrator. If everywhere you go smells like shit, maybe it’s time to check your shoes.
- thunderfork 1y ago[dead]