> He writes convincingly, he understands charisma and style, but he just can’t hold his own in an intellectual exchange. Yes, it's convincing because he actua

> He writes convincingly, he understands charisma and style, but he just can’t hold his own in an intellectual exchange. Yes, it's convincing because he actually cares to craft a reasoning that you can follow for yourself and definitely not charisma and style This is just a biased retelling of what happened. Scott responded to Cowen's response. So it's just like... your opinion, man. I encourage anyone to just go read the exchange and decide for themselves.