4 ms·
The point is not the visualization towards the driver. It's that the same data clearly is the base for the decisions this car makes. If it is not showing the ki
by Fischgericht 1y ago
The point is not the visualization towards the driver. It's that the same data clearly is the base for the decisions this car makes. If it is not showing the kid crossing the street, you also will not get an emergency break warning, which I get in tons of other situations.
What you see is what you get.
- yreg 1y agoI'm sorry, I struggle to understand your point. Which one is it? - Do you think that a Tesla with an enhanced Autopilot would hit a kid because you don't see it in the visualization? - Or do you think that a Tesla with FSD Beta would hit a kid because it uses "the same data" as the one without it?
- lechatonnoir 1y agoI think the idea is, why would the visualization be so intentionally bad in the Autopilot version as to not detect the kids entirely? What benefit does that confer, or, from another perspective, what software constraint forces this to be the case?
- Fischgericht 1y agoExactly that, yes. Thank you.
- yreg 1y agoIt's not _intentionally bad_. Autopilot and FSD are _different products_ with _different tech_. It's not like they could simply copy `detect_children()` from FSD to Autopilot and call it a day.
- lechatonnoir 1y agoHmm, that might be possible, but that's essentially not what I assumed. At the very least, they operate on the same hardware, so Autopilot is in some sense "intentionally bad" as a whole.