> When the likes of Peter Scholze (fields medal!) and other very high profile mathematicians find (serious) flaws in every posted manuscript about this... I mea

> When the likes of Peter Scholze (fields medal!) and other very high profile mathematicians find (serious) flaws in every posted manuscript about this... I mean, it's pretty clear to me what's going on. The proof just doesn't go through. On the other hand, Ivan Fesenko (also a heavyweight; he is for example the PhD advisor of the Fields medalist Caucher Birkar) insists that Mochizuki's proof is correct. * Here is a popular scientific article from 2016 where Ivan Fesenko presents his perspective on this topic: https://inference-review.com/article/fukugen https://inference-review.com/article/fukugen * A popular scientific article by David Michael Roberts (also a renowned mathematician) from 2019 about where he believes an important contentious point in the different viewpoints of Scholze/Stix vs Mochizuki lies: https://inference-review.com/article/a-crisis-of-identification https://inference-review.com/article/a-crisis-of-identificat...