3 ms·
Obviously openAI’s point of view will be their point of view. They are going to call this lawsuit baseless, they would not be fighting it or else.
by sashank_1509 1y ago
Obviously openAI’s point of view will be their point of view. They are going to call this lawsuit baseless, they would not be fighting it or else.
- ivape 1y agoTo me it's pretty clear the way this will happen. You will need to buy additional credits or subscriptions through these LLMs that feedback payment to things like NYT and book publishers. It's all stolen. I don't even want to hear it. This company doesn't want to pay up and willing to let user's privacy hang in the balance to draw the case out until they get sure footing with their device launches or the like (or additional markets like enterprise, etc).
- fallingknife 1y agoCopyright is pretty narrowly tailored to verbatim reproduction of content so I doubt they will have to pay anything.
- tiahura 1y agoincorrect. copyright applies to derived works.
- vel0city 1y agoEven then, it's possible to prompt the model to exactly reproduce the copyrighted works.
- fallingknife 1y agoPlease show me one of these prompts
- vel0city 1y agoNYT has examples in their legal complaint. See page 30. https://www.scribd.com/document/695189742/NYT-v-OpenAI https://www.scribd.com/document/695189742/NYT-v-OpenAI
- Workaccount2 1y ago> It's all stolen. LLMs are not massive archives of data. The big models are a few TB in size. No one is forgoing a NYT subscription because they can ask ChatGPT to print out NYT news stories.
- edbaskerville 1y agoRegardless of the representation, some people are replacing news consumption generally with answers from ChatGPT.