10 ms·
These are two different products. It's like SpaceX launching satellites for competitive satellite internet services. They didn't care that they were providing l
by widdakay 1y ago
These are two different products. It's like SpaceX launching satellites for competitive satellite internet services. They didn't care that they were providing launch capabilities for a competitor and neither should Anthropic. What if Apple stopped allowing you to use an iPhone if you worked at Google?
- thrdbndndn 1y agoI think the nature of your two examples, along with the one from the news, is too different from each other for the analogy to really hold. These situations can only be judged on a case-by-case basis.
- tonyhart7 1y ago"They didn't care that they were providing launch capabilities for a competitor" Yeah because another internet provider did not have SpaceX reusable rocket technology its not really quite the same you know
- killerstorm 1y agoDo you understand that data can be used for training?
- paxys 1y agoIf SpaceX was launching every rocket at a loss then they would absolutely care about a competitor taking advantage of it.
- demosthanos 1y ago> What if Apple stopped allowing you to use an iPhone if you worked at Google? This wouldn't be remotely comparable. This is targeting of a competitor's employees, not targeting a competitor's subsidiaries. If you want to go the Apple-Google route a better comparison would be that this is like Apple refusing to allow you to hook up an Air Tag on an Android phone. Which is something that they do, in fact, do.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- danpalmer 1y agoAnother way this isn't comparable is that the training data is critical for the services each provides. Seeing answers Claude gives (at scale, for free) would be a huge competitive advantage to OpenAI, whereas Apple Mail seeing the email you send via Gmail wouldn't convey any competitive advantage in email, for example.