3 ms·
Well done on the NoScript front. It's rare to see a site on HN that requires JS and falls back to a nice explanation of why it needs JS (Instead of just stating
by tobiasu 14y ago
Well done on the NoScript front. It's rare to see a site on HN that requires JS and falls back to a nice explanation of why it needs JS (Instead of just stating the fact, or worse, displaying a white page).
- moonboots 14y agoI'm glad someone noticed! I hope you whitelisted typing.io in noscript:)
- tobiasu 14y agoI did ;-)
- ibotty 14y agoi did as well. nicely done! :D
- Iaks 14y agoI will! =) I just checked my comment history and about 50% of my comments have been related to this issue. This is the first one that is complimentary.
- tripzilch 14y agoI didn't notice because I had scripting on at the time, but it deserves another compliment, seeing as so few websites seem to bother these days. (even for those who think noscript browsing is not with the times any more, it's still good practice to give a decent error message / explanation instead of breaking or blanking)