> So then the courts need to find who is setting their chats do be deleted and order them to stop. No, actually, it doesn't. Ordering a party to stop destroyin

> So then the courts need to find who is setting their chats do be deleted and order them to stop. No, actually, it doesn't. Ordering a party to stop destroying evidence relevant to a current case (which is its obligation even without a court order) irrespective of whether someone else asks it to destroy that evidence is both within the well-established power of the court, and routine. > Or find specific infringing chatters and order OpenAI to preserve these specified users’ logs. OpenAI is the alleged infringer in the case.