> but I'm assuming his OF content is such that it would be hard to argue it doesn't qualify as "indecent" or "immoral." Don't just assume that. There's lots of

> but I'm assuming his OF content is such that it would be hard to argue it doesn't qualify as "indecent" or "immoral." Don't just assume that. There's lots of organisations with very strict views on behaviours, especially in sports. Ronnie O'Sullivan got fined for playing snooker without shoes for a few minutes for example. Or again for an untucked shirt.