4 ms·
Good use case. Although, they said the design is for planes. This is significant because the optics probably assume uninterrupted sky view with no interceding l
by contingencies 1y ago
Good use case. Although, they said the design is for planes. This is significant because the optics probably assume uninterrupted sky view with no interceding light sources which is an invalid assumption at ground level. If setting off a flare or cycling street lights is all it takes to deny positioning it's a weak terrestrial solution.
- relaxing 1y agoSo just move away from LOS sources of interference.