4 ms·
I know nothing about zig so just looked it up on wikipedia. Apropos of nothing it’s the first wikipedia article I’ve read that I’m convinced was written by/usin
by cogogo 1y ago
I know nothing about zig so just looked it up on wikipedia. Apropos of nothing it’s the first wikipedia article I’ve read that I’m convinced was written by/using an LLM.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zig_(programming_language) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zig_(programming_language)
- Hasnep 1y agoHaving skimmed it, I had the opposite reaction, the wording is clunky in a way that I haven't seen LLMs do, it feels very human to me. Stuff like > Also the learning curve for Zig can be steep, especially for those unfamiliar with low-level programming concepts. I don't think an LLM would start a sentence with "also" like that > The small and simple syntax is an important part of the maintenance, as it is a goal of the language to allow maintainers to debug the code without having to learn the intricacies of a language they might not be familiar with. The wording here feels like someone who's a fan of Zig taking a sentence praising Zig's design and trying to rework it into a slightly more neutral encyclopedia style.
- cogogo 1y ago> Other challenges mentioned by the reviewers are interoperability with other languages… This sounds exactly how llms have made comparisons for me. What reviewers?