3 ms·
They don’t seem to have reverse DNS set up correctly for the resolvers yet. Nor do the host names have AAAA records pointing to the IPv6 addresses.
by teddyh 1y ago
They don’t seem to have reverse DNS set up correctly for the resolvers yet. Nor do the host names have AAAA records pointing to the IPv6 addresses.
- AStonesThrow 1y agoDo you mean for the IPv4 addresses? Because have you ever seen the ip6.arpa ranges? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_DNS_lookup#IPv6_reverse_resolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_DNS_lookup#IPv6_revers... The funny thing is that they’re reusing the IPv4 octets, that look like decimal notation, but in the hexadecimal Interface ID: 2a13:1001::86:54:11:100 So only hilarity can ensue from misunderstanding that; but the reverse DNS may be achievable. Not to mention the unfortunate association with IPv4 in the service name. When will DNS6EU be released? More to the point, “for” is a distinctly English word, so has “4” become an international chatspeak stand-in?
- martin_a 1y ago> Not to mention the unfortunate association with IPv4 in the service name. I read it as "DNS for EU" not as a hint towards IPv4.
- miyuru 1y agomissed opportunity to shorten the IPv6 address.
- teddyh 1y agoNeither the IPv4 addresses nor the IPv6 addresses have reverse lookup set up correctly, as far as I can tell. Both are eminently, and easily, achievable.
- layer8 1y ago"4" as "for" is a decades-old naming convention. Remember log4j?
- xorcist 1y agoYou already know log4j. Now it's time for the sequel: log6j! On select cinemas in 2026. (It's a horror movie, don't bring the kids.)
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]