3 ms·

I'm usually against LLM's massive breach of copyright, but this argument is just weird. >At a conference in January, Wang raised a hypothetical in line with he

I'm usually against LLM's massive breach of copyright, but this argument is just weird. >At a conference in January, Wang raised a hypothetical in line with her thinking on the subsequent order. She asked OpenAI's legal team to consider a ChatGPT user who "found some way to get around the pay wall" and "was getting The New York Times content somehow as the output." If that user "then hears about this case and says, 'Oh, whoa, you know I’m going to ask them to delete all of my searches and not retain any of my searches going forward,'" the judge asked, wouldn't that be "directly the problem" that the order would address? If the user hears about this case, and now this order, wouldn't they just avoid doing that for the duration of the court order?

teitoklien 1y ago
Idk why but judges typically care more about flexing their powers instead of having decent idea as to how their actions end up setting future precedent or harm to the nation. (Just like how they made donating infinite money to political parties by one individual a fundamental right to free “speech” thereby breaking all existing donation limits and completely breaking apart our electoral process) The way this judge is pretending like there arent a gazillion ai models that can do this now One can simply download a app like msty.app combine it with openrouter or ollama based local model and crawl and do all of this from their computer. This order was absolute insanity and is going to make most corporate users be extremely skeptical with providing their data to american llm providers. This judge single-handedly put 100s of millions of chatgpt users privacy potentially breached and american businesses losing trust as reliable LLM providers not because of their own faults but because of judges like Ms. Wang This is why America needs a Right to Privacy as a constitutional amendment for american citizens just like how some european and asian countries have.

teitoklien 1y ago

Idk why but judges typically care more about flexing their powers instead of having decent idea as to how their actions end up setting future precedent or harm to the nation. (Just like how they made donating infinite money to political parties by one individual a fundamental right to free “speech” thereby breaking all existing donation limits and completely breaking apart our electoral process) The way this judge is pretending like there arent a gazillion ai models that can do this now One can simply download a app like msty.app combine it with openrouter or ollama based local model and crawl and do all of this from their computer. This order was absolute insanity and is going to make most corporate users be extremely skeptical with providing their data to american llm providers. This judge single-handedly put 100s of millions of chatgpt users privacy potentially breached and american businesses losing trust as reliable LLM providers not because of their own faults but because of judges like Ms. Wang This is why America needs a Right to Privacy as a constitutional amendment for american citizens just like how some european and asian countries have.