3 ms·
Isn't it a risk even if they retain nothing? Likely less of a risk, but it's still a risk that you have no way to deep dive on, and you can still get "pwned" b
by bcrosby95 1y ago
Isn't it a risk even if they retain nothing? Likely less of a risk, but it's still a risk that you have no way to deep dive on, and you can still get "pwned" because someone broke into their servers.
- fc417fc802 1y agoThe difference between maintaining an active compromise versus obtaining all past data at some indeterminate point in the future is huge. There's a reason cryptography protocols place so much significance on forward secrecy.
- godelski 1y agoThere's always risk. It's all about reducing risk. Look at it this way. If you your phone was stolen would you want it to self destruct or keep everything? (Assume you can decide to self destruct it) clearly the latter is safer. Maybe the data has been pulled off and you're already pwned. But by deleting, if they didn't get the data they now won't be able to. You just don't want to give adversaries infinite time to pwn you