3 ms·

I absolutely deny that there are any interesting ideas in there. We've done this, it was called the dark ages and it sucked and we moved past it. Engaging with

• coldtea 1y ago
  >We've done this, it was called the dark ages and it sucked and we moved past it. Well, the "dark ages" is now widely considered a misnomer, and that time is seen as an important era development-wise.
  • const_cast 1y ago
    But the development was very slow, and it was held back by policy and a stronghold by leaders onto the status-quo.
    • coldtea 1y ago
      On the other hand, it was development and stability - in an era where the previous Roman system had collapsed. Whereas now many argue it's decline and regression in many areas compared to recent past.
  • kiitos 1y ago
    No, it is not widely considered to be a misnomer. What are you trying to communicate with this comment?