3 ms·
Private and public philanthropy both contribute to science in the same way. If you're asking why private philanthropists can't replace federal funding, it's the
by whatshisface 1y ago
Private and public philanthropy both contribute to science in the same way. If you're asking why private philanthropists can't replace federal funding, it's the same as the reason why we can't just make billionaires pay all the tax: the NSF budget would bankrupt Bill Gates in 13 years.
More realistically, what would happen would be that rather than sacrificing themselves for the greater good in some kind of voluntarily socialist outpouring of wealth, they'd ask us to look to China for our scientific future.
- throwawaymaths 1y agoStop doing expensive science? Some things can just wait for tech to catch up and make science easier by lowering costs. An example is the superconducting supercollider. Chemistry and pharma industry were making NMRs cheaper and the cost of the supercollider components went down. So the LHC was a much more effective "buy" than the SSC.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]