3 ms·
"u8" would have done the job fine and actually been readable
by 38 1y ago
"u8" would have done the job fine and actually been readable
- Macha 1y agoIt would need to be &u8, as without a reference, you won't have any captured lifetimes, and therefore it wouldn't serve as an example for the capturing lifetime feature. &u8 is also a mostly pointless type in reality.