3 ms·
Tails are what get you though. I'd probably smash a robot that swore at me or my family. "Tell your c---t daughter to get off the street" Will probably resul
by mousethatroared 1y ago
Tails are what get you though.
I'd probably smash a robot that swore at me or my family.
"Tell your c---t daughter to get off the street"
Will probably result in me looking for a heavy stone.
Swear words are literally fighting words whilst a robot cannot, legally, be assaulted. I'll take destruction of property to defend my daughter's honor to a jury of normies.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- Swizec 1y agoI'd prefer swearing over a robot who says "Per my last email, ..." But let's be honest: The thing we're both afraid of is a robot who can get impatient and emotional.
- mousethatroared 1y agoThey've already programmed impatience to the chat bots in federal government offices. Get testy and they'll hang up on you. However, they can't get emotional, they lack soul.
- delichon 1y agoYou don't want me on that jury. But if you pick up a heavy civil suit instead of a stone, you do.
- mousethatroared 1y agoCivil suit for what? It needs to get to a jury and for that the prosecutor needs to think he'll win. I doubt most prosecutors will stake their conviction ratio for a very sympathetic defendant. (Except in San Fran and DC. There ill take whatever deal Im offered)
- delichon 1y agoYou don't need a prosecutor's cooperation to file a civil lawsuit in the US. In the described scenario I'd be happy to find in your favor for intentional infliction of emotional distress, with negligence and vicarious liability and extra zeros.