gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06 specifically per the paper. It seems a bit problematic to call this Gemini-2.5 Pro given that in the near future we're presumably

gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06 specifically per the paper. It seems a bit problematic to call this Gemini-2.5 Pro given that in the near future we're presumably going to have something different called that without further qualifying version numbers. (The author's fault, not the parent comment's)