> the assertion that "VLMs don't actually see - they rely on memorized knowledge instead of visual analysis". If that were really true, there's no way they woul

> the assertion that "VLMs don't actually see - they rely on memorized knowledge instead of visual analysis". If that were really true, there's no way they would have scored as high as 17%. The ability to memorize leads to (some) generalization [1]. [1] https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/chatterjee18a/chatterjee18a.pdf https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/chatterjee18a/chatterjee18...