>nowhere near as damaged by the attack as some pro-Ukraine commentators are suggesting These kind of meta conversation taglines always make me skeptical of an

>nowhere near as damaged by the attack as some pro-Ukraine commentators are suggesting These kind of meta conversation taglines always make me skeptical of an article. Not as damaged as what? vs someone somewhere on the internet who overstated things? I'm sure someone on the internet overstates just about anything. So I go on and read the article and yup, nothing that really indicates more or less damage than I've already seen.