5 ms·

Readers would have been better served with the prompts you wrote than the AI generated output.

• steipete 1y ago
  All ~50 prompts would take you have an hour to read and wouldn’t bring across my point nearly as good.
  • layer8 1y ago
    But it would provide a better illustration of how you’re actually working.
    • simonw 1y ago
      If you're interested in seeing the process behind this piece of writing you can read through a lot of the details in the 71 commits that went into creating the story in the PR: https://github.com/steipete/steipete.me/pull/106/commits https://github.com/steipete/steipete.me/pull/106/commits
  • Applejinx 1y ago
    Well…
• simonw 1y ago
  I don't think that's true. What matters to me is the human editorial touch: I don't want to wade through 50 prompts and responses, I want a human author to have resolved that process into a final output that they think is worth sharing with me.
  • rfoo 1y ago
    I think the correct benchmark is `len()`. Give me your prompts or your output, whichever is shorter.
    • tasuki 1y ago
      No
• thrwthsnw 1y ago
  Try reading a manuscript copy of a book before it’s been edited. Yes I know some people do this out of interest but for most people it’s not the type of writing they are interested in reading or would get the most out of.