2 ms·
One need not apply a "human" characteristic to define something as art, only the characteristic of intent. Perhaps that's better suited for GP's definition, whi
by mossTechnician 1y ago
One need not apply a "human" characteristic to define something as art, only the characteristic of intent. Perhaps that's better suited for GP's definition, which I otherwise find agreeable.
- ivape 1y agoSo what's the intent behind a flower looking beautiful? You see you will have to make the argument that a flower isn't art or ... that other explanation (something intended it be beautiful).